November 3, 2010

Supreme Court Split on California Video Game Law

The Supreme Court appears to be split on the California Videogame law that forbids the sale of game to children under 18 that depict scenes of gratuitous violence, sex and torture. 

“”Why isn’t it common sense,” said Justice Stephen G. Breyer, that if the law can forbid selling pictures of a “naked woman” to a young teen, it can also forbid the sale of scenes “of gratuitous torture of children” in a video game?

 Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. agreed, citing scenes from the game Postal 2 in which girls are smashed in the face with a shovel and their bodies set on fire.

“We don’t have a tradition in this country” of exposing children to that kind of graphic violence, he said. But in a case that seemed to break the usual liberal-conservative alliances, Justice Antonin Scaliaclashed with Roberts and Breyer and argued that the 1st Amendment’s protection for freedom of speech has never been applied to restrict violence in the media. 

“The same argument could have been made when movies came out that exposing children to violence would harm them”, he told a lawyer for California.”

This case has been circling around Washington for some time now.  This case, in my opinion, represents a huge land mark in free speech.  I should state that I think it is very important to shelter our children from this type of material.  I don’t think 0 -16 year old should be exposed to extreme amounts of gore, sex and violence.  However, I believe that it is the responsibility of the parents to make sure their children are protected from this NOT the governments.   This case most likely won’t be decided for another couple of months. 

What do you guys think?  Do you think it is the governments responsibility to step in where parents are obviously failing?  Is it the governments right? 

Quotes taken from LA Times.

4 comments

  1. ScrotusKilmystr - November 11, 2010 3:18 pm

    This is the same argument that’s been going on for each generation from the 50’s till now. It’s the same debate “we have to protect the children!” with the ESRB and parental controls on every console on the market, even software for PC’s that con restrict what it loaded/played/viewed is avaible parents just have to GET INVOLVED in their kids lives!
    I’m in the retail end of the industry and telling parents why the game is rated doesn’t make a differance 9 out 10 times they will still buy it. This whole issue is just tired and played out for votes!

    Reply
  2. thsoundman - November 11, 2010 3:09 pm

    I don’t understand why parent’s have such a hard time saying no to their children. It just seems like so many go to great lengths to never say no to them. My father said no to me all of the time and I sure as hell didn’t throw a fit. I’d been stupid as shit to backtalk my old man or my mother for that matter just because they told me I couldn’t have something. You are supposed to be a parent first and friend second… not the other way around. But what do I know… I was only a kid once and I’m not a parent.

    Reply
  3. zero_19 - November 11, 2010 8:17 am

    As a father, I agree with T8. My children will play the games that I buy for them when I feel they are ready/mature enough for the “next level”.

    Reply
  4. T8 - November 8, 2010 9:20 am

    the government should never step in for the lack of proper parenting. My children will play what video games I WANT them to play when I WANT them to play. If the government steps in, its just another instance where parents give over another one of their rights because they dont want to have to raise their own children.

    Reply

Have your say

Archives - Powered by WordPress - A theme by cssigniter.com